Skip to content
2023 Murder TrialtranscripttranscriptRonnie Crosby — Direct/Cross/Redirect (Recall 1) - Day 10 - 2023 Murder TrialRonnie Crosby completed testimony about PMPED’s missing fees, Alex Murdaugh’s account of the night of the killings, voices on State’s Exhibit 297, family firearms, and the Moselle investigation.
John MeadorsCreighton WatersJim GriffinClifton NewmanRonnie CrosbyJudge NewmanMr. WatersCourt ClerkRonnie CrosbyMr. GriffinCourt BailiffMr. Meadorsdirectcrossredirect
2023 Murder Trial/Day 10/February 7, 2023
3 pages·3 witnesses·2,908 lines
Ronnie Crosby completed testimony about PMPED’s missing fees, Alex Murdaugh’s account of the night of the killings, voices on State’s Exhibit 297, family firearms, and the Moselle investigation.
Proceedings
DirectRonnie Crosby - DirectLine 14
CrossRonnie Crosby - CrossLine 3
RedirectRonnie Crosby - RedirectLine 2

JUDGE NEWMAN: Okay. Thank you. You may call your next witness.

MR. WATERS: May it please the court Your Honor? The state calls Ronnie Crosby.

The witness, RONNIE CROSBY, was first duly sworn and testified as follows:

COURT CLERK: State your name again for the record as you take the witness stand. Spell your last name, please.

56:16:04

RONNIE CROSBY: Ronnie Crosby, C-r-o-s-b-y.

66:16:10

DIRECT EXAMINATION

76:16:10

BY MR. WATERS:

86:16:12

MR. WATERS: MR. Crosby, how are you doing today?

96:16:15

RONNIE CROSBY: I'm doing okay.

106:16:16

MR. WATERS: Tell the jury what your profession is, please.

116:16:19

RONNIE CROSBY: I'm an attorney.

126:16:20

MR. WATERS: And where do you -- what -- do you work for a particular firm?

136:16:24

RONNIE CROSBY: I do. I work for -- currently for Parker Law Group.

146:16:28

MR. WATERS: And before it was Parker Law Group, did that firm have a different name?

156:16:32

RONNIE CROSBY: It did. It was Peters, Murdaugh, Parker, Elzroth, and Detrick. I've heard it referred to as PMPED earlier today, so --

166:16:40

MR. WATERS: Do you know the defendant, Alex Murdaugh?

176:16:43
186:16:44

MR. WATERS: Do you see him here in the courtroom?

196:16:47
206:16:48

MR. WATERS: Can you point him out to the jury?

216:16:51

RONNIE CROSBY: He is seated at defense table between Mr. Harpootlian and Mr. Griffin, and I believe he has a blue blazer on.

226:16:58

MR. WATERS: Your Honor, can the record reflect he's identified the defendant?

236:17:01

JUDGE NEWMAN: It does.

246:17:03

MR. WATERS: When it was still PMPED, did Alex Murdaugh, was he a partner in the law firm that you were a part of?

256:17:08
266:17:08

MR. WATERS: And as a result of Mr. Murdaugh's actions, did that law firm kind of change its name now to Parker, or is that one of the reasons? Or how would you explain that?

276:17:20

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, yes. As a result of the actions that you heard about earlier today, we did change not only the name of the law firm but to a separate legal entity.

286:17:38

MR. WATERS: And how long have you been with -- and let's just go back and call it PMPED before all of this happened. How long had you been with PMPED?

296:17:46

RONNIE CROSBY: I started in the summer of '94, so almost thirty years now.

306:17:51

MR. WATERS: And when did you first get to know the defendant?

316:17:57

RONNIE CROSBY: Some time in the late 90's. I probably met him before then when I was working as a clerk for a judge, Judge Smoak whose picture is here in the courtroom, and -- probably met him in court but met him -- really think I started getting to know him at the time of his grandfather -- his great -- his grandfather's death, which would have been in the late 90's.

326:18:26

MR. WATERS: What was his grandfather's name?

336:18:27

RONNIE CROSBY: Randolph Murdaugh, Jr., or the second, and he went by the name of -- a nickname of Buster.

346:18:32

MR. WATERS: Was Buster in the law firm as well?

356:18:37

RONNIE CROSBY: He was there when I started. He would come, hold off -- come into office. Yeah, he was there. I don't think he was a principal or any kind of equity partner, but he was there, yes.

366:18:49

MR. WATERS: Over the years, did the defendant become -- did you become a partner in the firm?

376:18:53
386:18:53

MR. WATERS: What year roughly do you recall becoming a partner in the firm roughly?

396:18:58

RONNIE CROSBY: I would say somewhere around '99 to 2000.

406:19:02

MR. WATERS: And did the defendant become a partner in the firm as well?

416:19:08

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes. He came to work some time in the late 90's, early 2000's, and would become a partner probably somewhere around 2004 or 2005.

426:19:20

MR. WATERS: And became your law partner up until 2021 from that time?

436:19:28

RONNIE CROSBY: That's correct.

446:19:30

MR. WATERS: Just real quick before we move on, under the agreement that the partners had, what is the rules as it relates to fees that a partner earns during the course of the year?

456:19:42

RONNIE CROSBY: All fees belong to the law firm.

466:19:44

MR. WATERS: And just very quickly, explain to the jury very quickly just the compensation. Is most of the compensation for a partner received during the year or in one lump sum at the end of the year?

476:19:57

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, as Ms. Seckinger laid out earlier, we receive a salary, and then at the end of the year we divide net profits, which would generally be the -- a larger portion of your income, although not always. Sometimes, depending on how someone's year went, you may not get any -- much of anything as a bonus at the end of the year if you -- if your work did not generate sufficient fees to overcome the amount of overhead expenses that were -- was assigned to the individual attorney.

486:20:31

MR. WATERS: Generally, though, most of the compensation is in that end of the year bonus?

496:20:35

RONNIE CROSBY: That's fair to say.

506:20:36

MR. WATERS: Was that the case in your understanding for Alex?

516:20:39

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, not just Alex, but it was for all of us.

526:20:45

MR. WATERS: To your observations over the years, did Alex have a relatively lucrative practice?

536:20:53

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes, he did. He had up and down years like all people who do plaintiff's work, but, yeah, he was -- had a lot of good clientele.

546:21:02

MR. WATERS: Some years he would get bonuses of six and seven figures. Are you aware of that?

556:21:11

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes, he could.

566:21:13

MR. WATERS: If a lawyer were to do legal work with a partner in the firm and have those fees, if he was sharing a case with another lawyer and had the lawyer issue those fees directly to that lawyer instead of firm, what would that be?

576:21:35

RONNIE CROSBY: Mr. Waters, I'm fooling with this microphone and I may have missed a nuance in your question. Could you ask that again? I apologize. Trying to quit leaning but apparently I can't stretch it out any further.

586:21:46

MR. WATERS: Is it common in plaintiffs' cases for lawyers, let's say, within the firm or -- lawyers within the firm and lawyers outside of the firm to share cases?

596:21:56

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes, I do that. Probably 70 percent of my practice is with other law firms.

606:22:02

MR. WATERS: And in that instance, do you have to split the fee in the event there's a recovery by settlement or trial?

616:22:10

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes. If there's a recovery up front before when the trial -- the case begins and the work begins, there's an agreement on how a fee is going to be split with the other law firm. Sometimes there may be three -- you know, multiple law firms in a given case.

626:22:26

MR. WATERS: And are there instances then when the other law firm is responsible for disbursing the money, including disbursing the fees to PMPED?

636:22:34

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes, that happens quite often.

646:22:36

MR. WATERS: And if a lawyer in PMPED were to have those fees made out to him or her instead of the firm, what would that be?

656:22:47

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, it would be against our policy, but it would be stealing of fees from the firm if they went -- did not come to the firm because they belonged to the law firm.

666:22:59

MR. WATERS: Let me ask you a little bit about the defendant himself. What is your observations of the defendant's cell phone usage?

676:23:10

RONNIE CROSBY: He was somebody who used his cell phone a lot, I mean, more -- much more than I do. He was always on his cell phone.

686:23:21

MR. WATERS: And describe a little bit about your observations of him as a lawyer. What were his skills as a lawyer? What was he good at?

696:23:29

RONNIE CROSBY: Alex was a very good lawyer. He was good with people, very good at reading people, very good at understanding people, and very good at making people believe that he cared about them and building a rapport and trust with them. And he was very good with strategizing against insurance companies and opposing lawyers that ultimately got often times results that the lawyers in the firm would be really amazed at what a good job he was able to do.

706:24:10

MR. WATERS: Was he good at understanding the emotional value of a case and being able to leverage that?

716:24:16

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes. I mean, that goes hand in hand with what I just said. It was very much a strength that he had.

726:24:23

MR. WATERS: Was he a good technical lawyer? Did he have a lot of academic and technical skills as a lawyer?

736:24:31

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, I'm not going to judge his in intelligence because I think he's very intelligent. As far as being a real student of the law, probably wasn't and never developed a, like, a technical expertise like some lawyers will. Some lawyers specialize in one thing, like medical malpractice, and that's all they do, but he didn't. He was more of a general practitioner.

746:25:02

MR. WATERS: Around the time of the recession back in 2008, 2009, 2010, did you ever have any conversations with the defendant and gain a general understanding of his financial condition at that time?

756:25:16
766:25:16

MR. WATERS: And tell the jury what that was, please.

776:25:21

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, for a number of years Barrett and one of his non-lawyer business -- Alex and one of his non-lawyer business partners, a guy named Barrett Boulware, they did a lot of real estate transactions, you know, just buying land and speculating on it. And I think leading up to that they had purchased some property that -- speculating that they could sell it, maybe some developmental property and, of course, we all know what happened in 2008/2009, that market went bad, and I think it -- I think both Barrett as well as maybe some of the other partners did not have the financial ability to deal with those loans that they had financed it, and so I think Alex was having to carry a lot of that and it put a strain on him financially.

786:26:17

MR. WATERS: At some point after that, to your discussions with him and to your knowledge of the cases in the firm, did he have some big cases that you thought had rectified that strain, that financial strain?

796:26:29

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes. There was a string of rather large cases, some of them I actually worked on with him, that resulted in very large settlements that would have been, my understanding, would have certainly have been sufficient to rectify that, as well as, I believe, ultimately some of that property that was causing the strain was -- they were able to sell it. So, the long answer is yes.

806:26:53

MR. WATERS: What were some of those cases that you thought at least had rectified any financial issues that he had?

816:27:04

RONNIE CROSBY: A case referred to as Plyler. And these are internally the way we referred to them. Pickney, which also had a companion case Thomas. I think the Plyler case was actually four cases, but we referred to it as one. And then he had a case called Badger, and -- those cases would have been large cases.

826:27:30

MR. WATERS: And that's -- from your understanding, the legitimate fees from those cases were very, very large?

836:27:37

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes. The law firm earned and subsequently Mr. Murdaugh would have earned good income off those cases.

846:27:48

MR. WATERS: Are you generally familiar with what's called the boat case?

856:27:55
866:27:56

MR. WATERS: And is that the February 2019 both wreck in which Ms. Mallory Beach was killed?

876:28:04

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes. Ms. Beach actually worked for my wife.

886:28:08

MR. WATERS: Somebody you knew?

896:28:09

RONNIE CROSBY: Yeah. I knew her as well as the other girls and knew Paul.

906:28:15

MR. WATERS: As a result of that boat case, was it your understanding that the defendant had been civilly sued as a result of that?

916:28:28

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes. There was a lawsuit brought against Alex and others.

926:28:35

MR. WATERS: Moving on from the boat case, did you ever have any conversation with -- after the boat case, did you have any conversation with Alex about structuring his fees in any particular case?

936:28:50

RONNIE CROSBY: You know, that conversation had come up around the office with not only him but other lawyers over, over the years. To my knowledge, I was the only lawyer to ever do that. But he did some time in the spring of 2021, he had a conversation with me about that.

946:29:15

MR. WATERS: And what was the conversation you had with him?

956:29:20

RONNIE CROSBY: I think it was just generally asking me, you know, how it was, you know, done, whether I thought it was a good idea, what the process was, that type of thing. I don't recall the very specifics, but I do recall telling him that given the low interest rates that it wouldn't be very fruitful. If you had high interest rates and you can buy into, lock on an annuity, that it would make sense, but, you know, there were pretty much zero interest rates during that time.

966:29:52

MR. WATERS: And when you made that point, did he have any response to that?

976:29:57

RONNIE CROSBY: Other than he was thinking about doing that.

986:30:00

MR. WATERS: Now, you mentioned that you -- you're actually the only one in the firm that you recall doing -- structuring some fees. Is that correct?

996:30:08

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes, and I think that that's a fact, not just that I recall.

1006:30:11

MR. WATERS: All right, and so you actually set up a real structure, correct?

1016:30:17

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, yeah, I did.

1026:30:18

MR. WATERS: You didn't just divert the fees into another account and spend them, correct?

1036:30:24

RONNIE CROSBY: No. And to clarify, and I think Ms. Seckinger touched on it, was the traditional way of doing it to avoid taxes until you're older is -- you never take what's called constructive possession of the money. So, whoever -- if it's an insurance company, or whoever is paying the money, would pay to the annuity company, and they would buy an annuity and you would have a contract, and then whatever the terms is when you would start receiving that money, and then you would start paying taxes on it. You can take a structure without -- there has since then become other ones but they don't have the tax advantages, they don't really make much sense, where you can take the money and then buy -- you're basically just buying an annuity.

1046:31:16

MR. WATERS: Before I move on, do you know a person by the name of Gloria Satterfield? Or do you know of a person by the name of Gloria Satterfield?

1056:31:26

RONNIE CROSBY: I knew Gloria. I knew her for a lot of years.

1066:31:32

MR. WATERS: Did she have any employment relationship with the defendant, to your knowledge?

1076:31:36

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes, she did, and when my children were first born, she helped my wife out a little bit with some laundry and stuff.

1086:31:44

MR. WATERS: What, to your understanding, happened to her, if anything?

1096:31:51

RONNIE CROSBY: My understanding was that she was tripped by some of Alex and Maggie's dogs and hit her head, and approximately three weeks later she died. I don't think she ever came out of the hospital.

1106:32:08

MR. WATERS: Did you ever talk to the defendant about that event?

1116:32:12

RONNIE CROSBY: I recall having a brief conversation. It really wasn't a conversation. It was more him saying that the dogs knocked it down and that the -- he was -- the kids were going to sue him for Gloria's death.

1126:32:35

MR. WATERS: The kids? Which kids are you talking about?

1136:32:39

RONNIE CROSBY: Gloria's, Gloria's two boys, I believe she has.

1146:32:43

MR. WATERS: When you say the kids were going to sue him, did he say in the fashion that it was going to be an aggressive suit, or did he say in the way that he was going to help out?

1156:32:50

RONNIE CROSBY: Oh, I understood exactly that it was going to be a friendly insurance claim, so to speak, so that, hey, this happened, in hopes that the insurance company would probably pay them some amount of money to -- I took it to help them out.

1166:33:14

MR. WATERS: Did you ever have any other conversations with him about that case other than that one?

1176:33:20

RONNIE CROSBY: Never had another conversation -- well, no. I've never had a another conversation with him about it.

1186:33:27

MR. WATERS: Are you familiar with the case known as the Faris case or the Mack Trucks case?

1196:33:34

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes, I'm very familiar with it.

1206:33:36

MR. WATERS: Did you have any involvement in that case?

1216:33:40

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes. Early on I had some involvement. I was asked to get involved because it dealt with products -- a product failure, which is going back to your reference. It's sort of been my specialty over the years. It was where a drive shaft had fallen out of a Mack truck and caused a motorist to have an accident, and when -- we looked into it and it turns out there was a recall on it, and so pretty much made it where it wasn't going to be much of a fight about Mack's responsibility, and so I knew it then. And then when -- I didn't do anything else in it until it was coming up to trial, and I spent a lot of time talking with Alex about evidentiary issues, witnesses, how they were trying the case and the posture of it, that type of thing. So, yeah, I was familiar with it.

1226:34:33

MR. WATERS: Okay. Did you ultimately get involved where you were one of the lawyers representing the Farises?

1236:34:36

RONNIE CROSBY: No, I did not help him try it.

1246:34:39

MR. WATERS: All right. Did he have an outside lawyer associated with that, or were there other lawyers associated with that?

1256:34:45

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, as I referenced earlier, sometimes there's more than just two law firms. There was a lawyer friend of ours in Columbia that got -- named Mr. Ridgeway, got Mr. Chris Wilson involved, and then in turn Chris Wilson asked Alex to get involved, which Alex and Chris had worked together a good bit over the years. So, there's three law firms.

1266:35:11

MR. WATERS: At some point in May of 2021, did you ever have a conversation with Jeannie Seckinger about the -- well, let me back up. So, ultimately did Alex and these other lawyers try the Faris case?

1276:35:25

RONNIE CROSBY: They did.

1286:35:26

MR. WATERS: And did they get a recovery in that case?

1296:35:29

RONNIE CROSBY: They did.

1306:35:30

MR. WATERS: And do you know how much Alex Murdaugh's share of the recovery was supposed to be?

1316:35:35

RONNIE CROSBY: I mean, the verdict was several million dollars. I believe that would have been in February of 2021. I believe the share that was supposed to go to PMPED was 792,000 as our portion of the fees.

1326:35:52

MR. WATERS: And you corrected me that that was the amount that was supposed to go to the firm, correct?

1336:35:59

RONNIE CROSBY: That's correct.

1346:36:00

MR. WATERS: $792,000. Did you ever -- in May of 2021, did you ever have a conversation with Jeannie Seckinger about those fees?

1356:36:06
1366:36:07

MR. WATERS: And tell me what that conversation was, please.

1376:36:11

RONNIE CROSBY: It was some time in close relation to Alex asking me about structuring attorney's fees. I walked in Lee Cope's office. Lee and Jenny were having a conversation about that issue and her efforts to get all of the paperwork on the Faris matter, and she was frustrated. She thought she was getting a run around both from Chris Wilson and Alex. And then she mentioned something to me about that he had suggested to her that he was trying to hide fees from the boating case.

1386:36:49

MR. WATERS: All right, and what was your reaction to that when you heard that?

1396:36:57

RONNIE CROSBY: Do you want me to say what I said?

1406:37:00

MR. WATERS: You can say the sanitized version or you can say the real version, either way.

1416:37:06

RONNIE CROSBY: I said oh fuck no. We are not.

1426:37:09

MR. WATERS: And why was that your reaction?

1436:37:12

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, because to do that under any circumstance was illegal, unethical, and he would be putting us at risk, and we absolutely were not going to participate in anything that -- that was illegal, unethical, or subjected us to liability or, you know, created issues with the South Carolina Bar.

1446:37:41

MR. WATERS: Was it the discussion of the firm leadership that that needed to be gotten to the bottom of to make sure that didn't happen?

1456:37:49

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, it was Lee, I, and Jeannie, and we put it in her hands because if -- she told us that she was being told it was in trust at Chris Wilson's office and, you know, I had no reason to doubt that. I thought he was just trying to take it out in some other way so it didn't go through our system or something, which would have also been tax fraud on our part not to have that accounted for because we would have gotten a 1099 at some point in time. And it was a myriad of reasons why that wasn't going to ever happen. But I thought if they're saying it was there, Jeannie, just take care of it. Get the money. And I didn't think any more about it, to be honest with you. I didn't think it was any stealing going on or anything. I thought that, okay, he's got pressure on him from this boating case and maybe thinks if he did an annuity out of Chris's trust account, that it wouldn't be accounted for. But it ultimately had to be accounted for, and I knew that. I do it -- involved a lot of our overseeing, you know, a lot of the accounting and understand it, and there's just no damn way we were going to do that.

1466:39:00

MR. WATERS: At that point in time, you just said you didn't think there was any stealing going on at that point, not yet at least.

1476:39:05

RONNIE CROSBY: No. That never came up during that period, and we're talking late May of 2021.

1486:39:14

MR. WATERS: Let me ask you this. You've known the defendant since the 90's?

1496:39:26
1506:39:28

MR. WATERS: Did you get to know his family?

1516:39:30

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes, I did.

1526:39:31

MR. WATERS: Did you get to know Maggie?

1536:39:35

RONNIE CROSBY: I knew Maggie.

1546:39:38

MR. WATERS: Did you know her fairly well?

1556:39:43

RONNIE CROSBY: I felt like I did, yes. She was a very nice person.

1566:39:52

MR. WATERS: Did you know Paul?

1576:39:55
1586:39:56

MR. WATERS: Tell me a little bit how you knew Paul.

1596:40:03

RONNIE CROSBY: I apologize. I knew Paul since he was born. Both he and Buster had always referred to me as Uncle Ronnie. We lived just across the way from each other, so I got to know him. I don't know, he used to -- when he got into hunting, he hunted a lot on my property, he and Buster. I have a farm right here in Colleton County where I grew up, and so I got to know him, you know, that way. And then Paul was -- I didn't think this would be that hard.

1606:40:51

MR. WATERS: Take your time.

1616:40:54

RONNIE CROSBY: Paul was really good with kids, and he took a liking to my son, who's younger, but he spent a lot of time with him. He would take him hunting, fishing. They would do a lot of hog hunting together. Paul had some hog dogs and, you know, just was around him a lot. He had a great personality. Just really, you know, somebody -- a kid I really loved, you know.

1626:41:19

MR. WATERS: Paul would come over to your property a good bit?

1636:41:24

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes, and then, you know, as -- and then sometimes as my son got older, he would go over to Moselle and hunt with Parker -- or hunt with Paul.

1646:41:41

MR. WATERS: Do you remember June 7th of 2021?

1656:41:47
1666:41:49

MR. WATERS: Did you see Alex earlier that day?

1676:41:53

RONNIE CROSBY: Can you ask that again? I'm sorry.

1686:41:55

MR. WATERS: Did you see the defendant at any point that day?

1696:41:57

RONNIE CROSBY: You know, I don't recall whether I saw him at the office. I was -- I had been in a trial in Columbia that settled. It was a couple of week trial and it settled on Friday afternoon. And I probably -- I know I came to the office to dig out some stuff, but it was fishing season and I promised my son as soon as I got out of trial we would go offshore fishing. So, I would have left work early that day to go get the boat prepared to go fishing. So, I don't remember seeing Alex that morning or the office. I could have, but it would have been -- I had saw him later that night, yes, sometime around 11:00 p.m.

1706:42:35

MR. WATERS: Before we get there, were you at home at that time?

1716:42:39

RONNIE CROSBY: Yeah, I was at home. We had just got finished getting the boat ready. You know, as a matter of fact and by way of example, we had invited Paul to go fishing with us the next day, and he had to work and couldn't go. My son had called him about it, you know. It was -- I think we had just eaten supper and, you know, sitting there looking at the weather and looking at all of the things you do before you go offshore kind of.

1726:43:07

MR. WATERS: Did you get a phone call or did you get a text?

1736:43:12

RONNIE CROSBY: My wife got a phone call, I believe, from Randy's wife wanting my partner Mark Ball's wife, Lisa's, phone number. She's a registered nurse. And it was sort of a quick phone call. She gave it to her. I don't know if Christy just couldn't get it at the time. And at some point after that, I called Randy and asked him, you know, what was going on, and I don't remember his exact words but he -- it was something about Maggie and Paul being shot.

1746:43:50

MR. WATERS: When you heard that, what was your reaction?

1756:43:55

RONNIE CROSBY: I guess the best to describe it is shock, alarm. I immediately told my wife I had to go, and I got in my vehicle and started -- headed to Moselle.

1766:44:14

MR. WATERS: Did you get there? About what time do you think you got there?

1776:44:19

RONNIE CROSBY: I did get there, and I arrived at -- I'm going to say somewhere on one side or the other of 11:00.

1786:44:28

MR. WATERS: Did you get to the residence or did you go to the kennels?

1796:44:33

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, when I got there I could see the lights. I didn't know where to go, but when I got there, I could see the lights at the kennels. And I was familiar with Moselle, having been there many times, and so I went to the lights. You could see there was law enforcement lights, maybe a -- it could have been Colleton Fire and Rescue, but it was obvious that's where you needed to go. So, I came in the main gate and turned right on what used to be a runway and went straight to the kennels.

1806:45:03

MR. WATERS: Did you get out of your car?

1816:45:07
1826:45:08

MR. WATERS: Did you talk to anyone at that point?

1836:45:13

RONNIE CROSBY: I'm confident that my partner Mark Ball was already there, Alex was there, and I know I spoke with both of them.

1846:45:27

MR. WATERS: Were Maggie and Paul still there?

1856:45:32

RONNIE CROSBY: Yeah, Maggie and Paul were there.

1866:45:37

MR. WATERS: Did you talk to the defendant at any point that night?

1876:45:43
1886:45:44

MR. WATERS: How late -- how long did you stay at Moselle after that first time you arrived?

1896:45:52

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, we stayed outside, and then at some point -- I'm going to say we stayed -- I stayed until about 3:30. But -- it just seems that we were standing around back in the house, and the -- it just was like we didn't know what to do or what to say, and I knew that Alex was going to have a long few days -- several days coming up, and I was, like, guys, we're not doing any good here. Let's -- we need to all go get some sleep and -- you know, so we can deal with tomorrow. And I think I was the first one to leave, and I almost feel like everybody else pretty much left in the period of time after that. But I -- you know, but I know I was the first to leave and I think it was around 3:30.

1906:46:48

MR. WATERS: Did you return to Moselle the next day?

1916:46:51
1926:46:52

MR. WATERS: Did you have conversation with the defendant the next day?

1936:46:59
1946:47:02

MR. WATERS: Over the course of those -- the night of and the next day when you had conversations with the defendant, did he either tell you or were you present when he related to you his activities the night of June 7, 2021?

1956:47:20

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes. I gained an understanding of the events of that night over multiple conversations and sometimes perhaps just questions because, I mean, without being a lawyer, you would want to figure that out. And being a lawyer and just having something so horrific, we wanted to contribute anything we could to help figure out who did this, who did it.

1966:47:50

MR. WATERS: And what did Alex tell you about his activities that night?

1976:47:56

RONNIE CROSBY: He told me -- and when I say me, there may have been multiple people in these conversations. I mean, we were all back at the house at Moselle providing support for, you know, our friend who had just lost his family, and that he worked and somewhere, 5:30 to 6:00 had left work. That he went to Moselle. That Paul had come home from work and that they rode around, and then at some point they went back to the house and had dinner, and Maggie was there, my understanding. And then after dinner, that Maggie and Paul went to -- went outside and -- to the dog kennels, and that he sat on the couch and fell asleep, and that would have been around 8:00 that he sat on the couch and ultimately fell asleep.

1986:49:12

MR. WATERS: He said between 8:00 and 9:00 he was asleep on the couch, or he was at the house?

1996:49:22

RONNIE CROSBY: He said -- I took it that he laid down on the couch maybe watching TV and fell asleep, and then around 9:00 he woke up, and then somewhere around 9:00 he went to -- back to Varnville to Almeda to check on his mother.

2006:49:42

MR. WATERS: And what did he say after that -- he did after that?

2016:49:46

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, he said he laid on the bed with her. He didn't give a time but that he laid there. I took it it was just sort of laying there to comfort her because I understood her condition. And then he said that he came back to Moselle, and that he went to the house, and that when he got to the house he discovered that Maggie and Paul were not there, and that he then got back in his car, or his Suburban, which was an office-issued vehicle, and he drove down to the kennels. And there's more than just kennels there. I think y'all have seen maybe the sheds there, and he discovered Maggie and Paul's bodies.

2026:50:48

MR. WATERS: Did he say whether or not he had gone down to the kennels with Maggie and Paul before he left to go to Almeda after 9:00 p.m.?

2036:51:03

RONNIE CROSBY: That came up in one of the conversations, and he specifically said that he did not.

2046:51:10

MR. WATERS: Did not?

2056:51:12

RONNIE CROSBY: He did not.

2066:51:15

MR. WATERS: I'm going to play for you what's been admitted into evidence as State's 297. I want you to listen to it and tell me if you recognize any voices on this.

2076:51:54

(STATE'S 297, A SNAPCHAT VIDEO, WAS PLAYED BUT NOT TRANSCRIBED.)

2086:52:34

MR. WATERS: Did you recognize any voices on that video?

2096:52:43

RONNIE CROSBY: The three voices on that video are the voices of Paul Murdaugh, Maggie Murdaugh, and Alex Murdaugh.

2106:53:00

MR. WATERS: And how sure are you? How sure are you?

2116:53:09

RONNIE CROSBY: I'm 100 percent sure that's whose voices are on the audio there.

2126:53:22

MR. WATERS: Is this law firm pretty close knit?

2136:53:30

RONNIE CROSBY: Yeah, we're a very close knit group of lawyers. I think we have a very family-like environment with our staff, as well as the lawyers are all very close. A lot of us do, and still do, you know, a lot of activities together. Our families grew up together, you know, and a great experience working with these guys.

2146:54:08

MR. WATERS: Did these murders of Maggie and Paul, did it send a shockwave through the law firm greater family?

2156:54:15

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, yes, it did. Just beyond the horror and disbelief, we -- we didn't have an understanding. I mean, the staff had a general sense of insecurity and fear. We had to take a lot of security measures because we did not have an understanding of what the possibilities out there could be. And then this horrific loss of, you know -- I think Paul had, you know -- the kids, Maggie would come up to the law firm regularly, you know, maybe needed to use the computer or just to see Alex or whatever. So -- and it as much of a shock as you could imagine.

2166:55:12

MR. WATERS: In the wake of this tragedy, did the law firm family rally to the defendant's aid?

2176:55:20

RONNIE CROSBY: We did. We were there every day for the rest of the week, and as y'all already know, Mr. Randolph passed away in the wake of this. So, it was a really bad week where the Murdaugh family in particular -- but all of us -- needed to be together to support each other.

2186:55:44

MR. WATERS: With all of this tragedy and the support and the outpouring and everything going on, did you have any discussion about what to do about the Faris fees, or was there a discussion to -- that this can't be the time to bring this up?

2196:56:04

RONNIE CROSBY: The only discussion that I recall was Alex told you they were in trust. Let's don't -- there's no way we're going to talk about money in this -- in -- and we had no reason to not believe that. I wasn't aware of some of Jeannie's conversations, you know. I was aware that Alex told her they were in trust. I trusted him and I said let's just leave it be. You know, I don't know -- I would -- it's just not something that you would talk about is money in the wake of such tragedy that had gone on the week of June 7th, including the loss of Mr. Randolph.

2206:56:54

MR. WATERS: At some point in July of 2021, did it come to your understanding that at least the firm had heard from Chris Wilson's firm that supposedly those missing fees were in his trust account?

2216:57:05

RONNIE CROSBY: That was reported to me. I did not look at the email, but it was reported, and that was even further confirmation that we didn't have an issue because we had worked on many cases with Mr. Wilson's law firm. And if he said it -- another lawyer who is a friend and colleague said I've got the money, then, you know, it wasn't something to be concerned about.

2226:57:29

MR. WATERS: Before I forget to ask you this, you said that you had built a relationship with Paul. Is that right?

2236:57:37
2246:57:38

MR. WATERS: Did you eulogize Paul at his funeral?

2256:57:42
2266:57:44

MR. WATERS: And you and your son liked to hunt and fish and do outdoor things with Paul?

2276:57:54
2286:57:56

MR. WATERS: And that's how you got to know him well?

2296:57:58

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, you've got to understand that even like when we go to legal conventions, a lot of time we take our kids with us. I was just around Paul a lot. It wasn't just hunting and fishing, but he pretty much had free reign of my property, but he would always tell me. Paul was a very polite young man and he wouldn't just go, even though he could. He would always let me know. And, you know, he killed a lot of his first deer on our property, and, you know, just got to see him grow up.

2306:58:33

MR. WATERS: Did Paul have a shotgun he favored, to your knowledge?

2316:58:40

RONNIE CROSBY: I would see Paul with a, like, a 12 gauge Benelli Super Black Eagle. Yeah, I've seen him with that a number of times.

2326:58:53

MR. WATERS: Did Paul occasionally like to hunt hogs?

2336:58:58

RONNIE CROSBY: There was a period of time where he was obsessed with it. He had dogs and then those 300 Blackout with a thermal scope, and, you know, he would do it. And I loved for him to come to my property to do it because anybody who has ever seen what hogs do to property, they're a nuisance, and so I was happy for him to come and shoot them.

2346:59:21

MR. WATERS: And he used one gun for that?

2356:59:24

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, you know, in the early years he used a 300 a lot, and then they got where they were catching them and killing them with knives and stuff like that, so they -- you know, hog hunters do it in different ways. But the 300 Blackout, I think, was -- usually accompanied him.

2366:59:40

MR. WATERS: In the aftermath of the murders, did you have any conversation, or were you privy to any conversations in which Alex talked about the family 300 Blackouts?

2376:59:53

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, the day after -- I saw the casings that night and thought that they were 223s and I -- when I found out the next day from somebody with Colleton County, one of the guys I knew who was there, that they were actually 300 Blackouts, you know, we started inquiring of where Paul's and Buster's 300 Blackouts were located. And I remember asking Alex about it, and he said that one of them was in the room and that he didn't know where the other one was.

2387:00:42

MR. WATERS: Did he mention a third one at that time?

2397:00:44

RONNIE CROSBY: At some point he did. There was a --

2407:00:46

MR. WATERS: Go ahead.

2417:00:46

RONNIE CROSBY: He said that one of them had gotten stolen or misplaced, which if it was misplaced, that would not seem odd to me because Paul was pretty good about -- he would sometimes leave his guns at my place, just -- and that he had bought a replacement at some point in time. I don't recall the dates on any of that.

2427:01:10

MR. WATERS: Did he tell you what happened to the replacement?

2437:01:16

RONNIE CROSBY: No. I assumed that the replacement was -- that they still had the replacement. I never heard anything about anything with a replacement, just that they had a total of three. And I remembered that Mr. Bedingfield had built those rifles.

2447:01:45

MR. WATERS: You testified that after moving into July and August you had gotten an email, or at least been informed that there had been some representation that Chris Wilson had those fees, correct?

2457:02:08

RONNIE CROSBY: That's correct.

2467:02:10

MR. WATERS: Moving into September of 2021, did you have any trial or anything going on that you were actually involved in at the time?

2477:02:18

RONNIE CROSBY: At the end of August, early September, I was getting ready for a products liability trial over in Dorchester County that was going to last several weeks.

2487:02:31

MR. WATERS: Did you receive any communications from your firm about any issues regarding the defendant?

2497:02:39

RONNIE CROSBY: We were doing pretrial motions, things that you do before a trial starts. There's a lot that gets done by the Court, and so we were taking care of a lot of things that would keep the jury from waiting around during the trial beforehand, and September the 2nd we were over arguing motions and taking care of pretrial matters. And so I -- when I got out of court, I saw that I had missed communications from one of my partners, Mark Ball, and I called him, and he said we have a problem. And I was, like, what? And he said you have to come now. And I said I'm just walking out of court, I need to go home and eat supper and it's not on my way. And he wouldn't -- he didn't ever tell me what it was, but he said you have to come now, and I could tell an urgency. And so he told me where to meet them, and that would have been in Cummings, South Carolina, at my partner, Danny Henderson's, place and -- which was not on my way home, but he was so insistent that I went there and met -- when I got there, Danny and Mark were there waiting on me.

2507:04:03

MR. WATERS: All right, and ultimately what was your discussion?

2517:04:07

RONNIE CROSBY: I was given a folder that had paperwork in it, and that paperwork consisted of checks, both front and back, and I was asked to review them.

2527:04:24

MR. WATERS: And were those the -- what's been called the fake Forge checks?

2537:04:30

RONNIE CROSBY: I believe the fake Forge checks, it was not all of them that Ms. Seckinger went over, but I believe there was -- I could probably call the names of most of them that were there. I know it was Anderson, Bush, Moore, there was probably about five or six of them, and I believe they had a copy of the Faris check there, too.

2547:04:53

MR. WATERS: The Faris check?

2557:04:54

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes, and I had sat for a minute and reviewed it. I think Danny said you're going to need a drink, and so --

2567:05:05

MR. WATERS: Did you have a drink?

2577:05:08

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes, ultimately more than one.

2587:05:10

MR. WATERS: What happened after that?

2597:05:13

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, they didn't tell me what was in it. They let me review it on my own, and I immediately said this is bad. And my words then were that we have to terminate Alex. He cannot -- no longer practice with us. And that was within I don't know how many minutes, but it was not a long period of time because the way Jeannie had it laid it out, it was clear what had happened and that this money had been stolen.

2607:05:50

MR. WATERS: Did any of the partners go to confront Alex with this information that had been uncovered?

2617:05:57

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes. There was a meeting the following morning at Lee's house. I did not attend. I did not need to attend. I was still getting ready for trial. I had already decided where this was going. And they met and then we -- Danny and Randy, Alex's brother, went and met with Alex.

2627:06:23

MR. WATERS: And what was your understanding of what the defendant said as a result of that?

2637:06:28

RONNIE CROSBY: That he admitted and, and said that he was -- knew he was going to get caught at some point in time, and admitted to them that he did it.

2647:07:04

MR. WATERS: Ultimately did the firm engage in a very extensive investigation to determine the extent of any alleged misrepresentations that the defendant had done with -- relating to client fees -- or excuse me, firm fees or client money?

2657:07:29

RONNIE CROSBY: We did. We initially turned over what we had to State Law Enforcement and then decided to -- well, we immediately decided to hire an outside auditor, a forensic auditor to come in and look at our books to see if there was anything else, but parallel with that we were doing our own internal investigation into his files.

2667:08:01

MR. WATERS: And was Jeannie Seckinger as your CFO, was she heavily involved in that review?

2677:08:08

RONNIE CROSBY: She was a point person of doing that with whatever support staff she needed under the -- my supervision and Mark and Lee's supervision.

2687:08:19

MR. WATERS: Have you seen spreadsheets that she's made and other documentation that's been put together and gathered by others in the firm as that investigation went forward?

2697:08:31

RONNIE CROSBY: I'm very familiar with all of it.

2707:08:33

MR. WATERS: And are the results of those accurate as you've been able to review firm records and gather information?

2717:08:38

RONNIE CROSBY: The documents that were entered into evidence earlier today through Ms. Seckinger are accurate.

2727:08:51

MR. WATERS: At any point in time, whether June of 2021 or going back years, if you as a partner in PMPED had found out that the defendant was allegedly diverting money to an account in the name of a business, an account that he actually controlled and then converting that to personal use, client money, what would you have done?

2737:09:24

RONNIE CROSBY: If I had become aware of it, he would have been asked to resign, or I would have forced a vote and he would have been terminated under our contract.

2747:09:39

MR. WATERS: What else, if anything, would you have done?

2757:09:42

RONNIE CROSBY: I would have done the same thing we did. Would have turned it over to law enforcement and would have reported to the South Carolina Bar because of -- it affected our business and our trust account.

2767:09:57

MR. WATERS: If at any point over the years you had found out that the defendant had been diverting fees that were properly due the firm and spending those for personal use and never accounting for them and not being truthful with firm members, what, if anything, would you have done?

2777:10:13

RONNIE CROSBY: He would have been asked to resign, or a vote would have been called and he would have been terminated.

2787:10:22

MR. WATERS: All right. What else would you have done, if anything?

2797:10:26

RONNIE CROSBY: Because that conduct would have been illegal, it would have been reported to law enforcement, as well as the South Carolina Bar.

2807:10:39

MR. WATERS: If at any point in time you had uncovered or had discovered information that the defendant was having checks issued from the firm trust account in the name of Palmetto State Bank, and that having someone at the bank convert those into checks that he could use for personal use, what, if anything, would you have done?

2817:11:01

RONNIE CROSBY: I would have asked for his immediate resignation and/or forced a vote, and he would have been terminated. His activities would have been reported to law enforcement, as well as any activities of anyone at the bank who was complicit in this, what I would call a money laundering scheme.

2827:11:33

MR. WATERS: And in each one of those instances, would the firm have also engaged in a detailed review to determine the extent of any alleged misappropriation?

2837:11:44

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, absolutely. And I can only wish that one of those clients early on had brought that -- something to our attention so we could have dealt with it years ago.

MR. WATERS: Thank you, Mr. Crosby. Nothing further at this time.

JUDGE NEWMAN: Cross-examination. As you prepare to come, let's all stand for a moment.

(Break in proceedings.)

JUDGE NEWMAN: Okay. Let's come to order. Mr. Griffin?

MR. GRIFFIN: Thank you, Your Honor.

CROSS-EXAMINATION

BY MR. GRIFFIN:

MR. GRIFFIN: Good afternoon, Mr. Crosby.

RONNIE CROSBY: Good afternoon, Mr. Griffin.

MR. GRIFFIN: Can we get this photo taken down? Can we just kill it? That was the computer. There it went. Good. Good. Good. Thank you.

2947:14:20

MR. GRIFFIN: Mr. Crosby, I was struck by a comment you made and I just want to confirm it. You were informed by folks at the meeting when Alex was confronted about financial misdeeds. According to the reports you received, that Alex's response was he knew he was going to get caught at some point in time. Is that what was reported to you?

2957:15:02

RONNIE CROSBY: That's what I recall.

2967:15:05

MR. GRIFFIN: And he did -- he asked you to speak at -- eulogize Paul at Paul's funeral, right?

2977:15:18

RONNIE CROSBY: He did, and I did.

2987:15:23

MR. GRIFFIN: And you were very close to Paul, and Paul was a super guy, wasn't he?

2997:15:34

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes to both of those questions.

3007:15:41

MR. GRIFFIN: You said that Paul carried around a 300 Blackout and a 12 gauge shotgun, a Benelli Super Eagle I believe you said?

3017:15:59

RONNIE CROSBY: That's my memory, and obviously they had numerous guns, but I had seen Paul with those on multiple occasions.

3027:16:11

MR. GRIFFIN: If I showed you a Benelli Super Eagle that's in the courtroom, would you be able to recognize it as Paul's or not or --

3037:16:22

RONNIE CROSBY: I don't know at this juncture. I may. I believe it was camouflaged.

3047:16:28

MR. GRIFFIN: A camouflage Super Eagle?

3057:16:30

RONNIE CROSBY: And, I mean, all camouflage Super Eagles, I mean --

3067:16:34

MR. GRIFFIN: I'm trying to not point it at anybody, but does this look like Paul's gun?

3077:16:45

RONNIE CROSBY: I'll say it looked like it. Will I say it was? I can't say that.

3087:16:52

MR. GRIFFIN: I understand.

3097:16:54

MR. GRIFFIN: And, Your Honor, I'm holding up for the record State's Exhibit Number 4. And I put my papers down.

3107:17:10

MR. GRIFFIN: Also you testified that when you got to Moselle the night of the 7th that you were -- you went through the main entrance, and that's the entrance with the -- I guess the brick facade or whatever, the brick gates opening up. That's the main entrance you went in?

3117:17:33

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes. There's a brick facade and then I think the metal iron gates, but they were open.

3127:17:40

MR. GRIFFIN: And then you -- if you go up -- and you would have gone straight to the house if you would have gone straight but you turned right, and you said, you know -- and there was the little roadway there, an old runway, and you were able to get back up to where the kennels were from that direction, correct?

3137:17:59

RONNIE CROSBY: That's correct. It's not far when you turn right, you know. It's a few -- a couple hundreds yards maybe.

3147:18:03

MR. GRIFFIN: And then -- but you said you were able to see shell casings, what you thought would be 223. Where were they?

3157:18:19

RONNIE CROSBY: The one out -- I don't think I saw every one that was there. I remember seeing one it seems like in the driveway closer to the road from Paul and Maggie's bodies.

3167:18:49

MR. GRIFFIN: So, were you able to get inside the crime scene tape?

3177:18:58

RONNIE CROSBY: I don't know if there was crime scene tape up at that point in time.

3187:19:06

MR. GRIFFIN: So you were able, as you recall, just to walk up. Were Maggie and Paul's bodies covered at the time you got there?

3197:19:22
3207:19:24

MR. GRIFFIN: But you were able to get into the crime scene close enough where you could tell what you thought the caliber of the shell casing?

3217:19:32

RONNIE CROSBY: Right, and I didn't walk from where I was parked there. I walked completely around the hangar and went over to talk to people I knew that were there, the fire and rescue people, just to get what their assessment was, and I could see from where they were positioned. I could see -- I wasn't like -- I didn't get over it, but I could see from a distance, and I'm very familiar with firearms --

3227:20:04
3237:20:04

RONNIE CROSBY: -- and I saw what I thought was a 223 casing.

3247:20:12

MR. GRIFFIN: Okay, and you later learned, I guess, the next day on the 8th that it wasn't a 223 but a 300 Blackout. Is that right?

3257:20:23

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes, and I can't for the life of me tell you there was -- at that point in time there was some law enforcement out in the hangar and around, and I just asked a question. They corrected me.

3267:20:45

MR. GRIFFIN: And then -- and you started to assist any way you could with trying to find out who could have done this. Isn't that right?

3277:21:01

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, Jim, I didn't that night. I was trying, you know, trying to get -- and we were starting to -- I don't know. It was shock, man, you know? But in the days following we had a lot of conversation amongst my partners and I about who could have done this, and obviously we were theorizing on stuff, you know, with very little information obviously. But we were trying to find out things, whether Paul had been in an argument with anyone or, you know, if anybody had -- I don't know. It's just what you would naturally do is ask questions.

3287:21:49

MR. GRIFFIN: One of the things -- you went down to Jimmy Butler's. Do you remember that?

3297:21:55
3307:21:57

MR. GRIFFIN: And what's Jimmy Butler's?

3317:21:59

RONNIE CROSBY: Jimmy Butler is a business in Varnville that does mechanic work. He sells trailers, he sells portable buildings, used to sell cars, but I had learned that Paul had taken his truck there the Friday before the murders.

3327:22:22

MR. GRIFFIN: Right, and so the Friday before the murders, Paul's truck -- and what was his normal truck? Was it F --

3337:22:27

RONNIE CROSBY: It was a F150.

3347:22:28

MR. GRIFFIN: A white F150.

3357:22:29

RONNIE CROSBY: A white F150.

3367:22:30

MR. GRIFFIN: And you had understood that his white F150 was put in the shop at Jimmy Butler's.

3377:22:38

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes, and I specifically was going to see if Paul's guns were in his truck.

3387:22:50

MR. GRIFFIN: Okay, and did you check the truck?

3397:22:53

RONNIE CROSBY: I did. I looked inside of it, and I also got -- I had learned that the -- a Mr. Rowe was working for Alex at the time and had taken him over to pick him up for when he took his truck to drop off for repairs, and I asked Mr. Butler to pull surveillance tape so I could see if Paul got his guns out of his truck while he was getting out of one vehicle into a another.

3407:23:26

MR. GRIFFIN: And because you knew it was Paul's habit to carry the guns in his truck, right?

3417:23:30

RONNIE CROSBY: Right, and I believe actually when I looked in there, there was still a pistol and some shotgun shells, that type of stuff in there, but I didn't see any long guns. I didn't get inside of his truck and rummage around. I just looked.

3427:23:45

MR. GRIFFIN: And so you didn't observe any 300 Blackout or any shotgun in Paul's truck at Jimmy Butler's. Is that right?

3437:23:51

RONNIE CROSBY: I did not.

3447:23:52

MR. GRIFFIN: And I think you also looked at videotape to see if Paul took guns out of his truck when he got back in -- I guess Mr. Rowe picked him up. Is that right?

3457:24:04

RONNIE CROSBY: That's correct, in other one of -- another pickup that Alex had on the farm.

3467:24:08

MR. GRIFFIN: And you didn't see Paul removing any guns from his truck when he got in the truck with Mr. Rowe?

3477:24:18

RONNIE CROSBY: That was not evident on the video that I saw.

3487:24:23
3497:24:24

RONNIE CROSBY: And I could see him getting out of one vehicle into the other.

3507:24:32

MR. GRIFFIN: And you were down there on the morning of the 8th, and after SLED had released the crime scene -- and when I say there, I'm talking about down at the kennels -- were you not?

3517:24:49

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes. I was asked to go there by Randy's brother Alex.

3527:24:58

MR. GRIFFIN: And, I mean, I don't want to be too grotesque at all, but just -- I mean, were there still blood and biological material there at the scene?

3537:25:23
3547:25:26

MR. GRIFFIN: And did you notice that there were some still birdshot pellets in the feed room that had not been collected by the SLED agent?

3557:25:47

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes. There were what appeared to me to be -- you know, we could pretty much tell what they were, yeah, from looking at them, and I believe they would have been a TSS type load.

3567:26:13

MR. GRIFFIN: And did you gather those up, to your knowledge?

3577:26:18
3587:26:20

MR. GRIFFIN: You or anybody, you know, with you.

3597:26:25

RONNIE CROSBY: Jim -- I mean, Mr. Griffin, I apologize. We know each other, so I apologize.

3607:26:32

MR. GRIFFIN: Call me Jim.

3617:26:33

RONNIE CROSBY: It's -- that area in that room -- well, we could see them. It was so bad, we thought we were going to at some point clean it up, but it overwhelmed both my partner Mark and I. Well, we could see that, and we could see everything, all of the other aftermath. We -- you -- I mean, we were getting biological material on -- I mean, we just couldn't be there, it was bad, you know, and it was overwhelming us. So, no, I did not try to collect evidence.

3627:27:18

MR. GRIFFIN: And the scene inside of that feed room, I take it, is something that still was etched in your mind's eye and memory?

3637:27:35
3647:27:37

MR. GRIFFIN: When you were down there with -- when you were down there the first time, I think you -- I believe you went up with -- to Mark Ball and he was there? He got there before you?

3657:27:53

RONNIE CROSBY: Maybe a few minutes. We had already talked about, you know, that.

3667:27:59

MR. GRIFFIN: Did it look to you and Mark like the crime scene was being preserved and carefully keeping people off of areas that maybe they shouldn't be trampling on?

3677:28:18

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, it was my understanding that the crime scene had been released, so that --

3687:28:23

MR. GRIFFIN: I'm talking about at 11:00 at -- I'm sorry, I jumped back. At 11:00, when you got there around 11:00 on the night of the 7th, when you pulled up, as I understand, you walked around the shed, the workshop, and went to the back and maybe Mr. Ball is back there. I could have that wrong, but is that what happened?

3697:28:48

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, we were there. I saw people working through the crime scene. And -- and you're kind are asking me for an opinion that I don't feel qualified to give because I assumed that whatever was going on was being done, you know, whatever procedures, but there were people in that -- you know, in the crime scene doing various things.

3707:29:16

MR. GRIFFIN: And I'm not asking you to give an opinion. I was just asking you if anyone expressed an opinion in your presence about they shouldn't be doing this or shouldn't be doing that.

3717:29:26

RONNIE CROSBY: I don't specifically recall.

3727:29:27

MR. GRIFFIN: Okay. Did at some point in time you and Mark and whoever else, were y'all directed to go to the main residence?

3737:29:46

RONNIE CROSBY: We were, and for the life of me I can't tell you who told us to go. I can tell you it was at the time that they -- the -- whoever is the photographer for the crime scene, they were getting ready to start, you know, taking photographs, and it was stated that we're going to photograph the scene. Y'all go to the house. We don't -- you know, you don't need to be in these photographs.

3747:30:21

MR. GRIFFIN: Okay. So, who all went to the house as best as you can remember?

3757:30:26

RONNIE CROSBY: I'm going to -- I know I did. I know Mark did. Austin Crosby, who's one of my partners, did. Danny Henderson did. Randy Murdaugh did. John Marvin did. Alex at some point did, and he may have been -- I believe he was accompanied by some officers when he came. I think maybe Chris Wilson may have. The others I'm positive of, but there could have been a couple of other people, you know.

3767:31:12

MR. GRIFFIN: And had it looked to you like anybody from law enforcement had searched the residence, inspected the residence before you guys went in?

3777:31:31

RONNIE CROSBY: I don't know that I would know what it would look like if it had been searched. It was my perception that it had not been searched yet.

3787:31:44

MR. GRIFFIN: And then you mentioned at some point in time Alex came up and maybe law enforcement were with him?

3797:31:53

RONNIE CROSBY: Mr. Griffin, my memory is that Alex came in at or about the same time two agents came, and I remember them collecting his clothes is what stands out to me. One stood in the doorway or the foyer to the house. We were kind of in the living room and maybe the kitchen area. And then another agent -- and I'm assuming it was SLED but, you know, it's kind of blurry, and it happened pretty quickly -- went maybe to the door of the bedroom while with Alex was changing clothes, and then he brought his clothes out and gave them to the agent who stood in the edge of the living room or foyer, whatever you want to call it.

3807:32:40

MR. GRIFFIN: And did the agent just open up a bag and Alex dumped his clothes in the bag? Is that how you remember, a paper bag?

3817:32:48

RONNIE CROSBY: I do not know what the composition of the bag was. It was a bag, and it seemed to me the agent was holding the bag out, like open, and that Alex kind of had his clothes in his fingers and just dropped them in is what my memory was, and what that was. I only recall there being one bag and he dropped them in, and it was, like, a pretty quick transaction.

3827:33:15

MR. GRIFFIN: His clothes were not put on a hanger for sure. Is that right?

3837:33:20

RONNIE CROSBY: No. Alex had them in his hands when he came out of the bedroom. He was in there long enough to take those off, and I think he put back on another pair of shorts or something and shirt.

3847:33:59

MR. GRIFFIN: I know -- I'm sorry, I'm jumping around a little bit.

3857:34:13

RONNIE CROSBY: It's okay. I've been right where you are, and that happens.

3867:34:24

MR. GRIFFIN: I think you mentioned in one of your interviews with SLED that Alex had some annoying quirks, and one of them is he would just take phone calls in the middle of a deposition?

3877:34:37

RONNIE CROSBY: He would.

3887:34:38

MR. GRIFFIN: Would he take -- would he get phone calls from his family -- Buster, Maggie, and Paul -- and drop everything and take the calls?

3897:34:49

RONNIE CROSBY: I've witnessed that.

3907:34:52

MR. GRIFFIN: And was that frequent?

3917:34:55

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes. He would do it in depositions, he would do it in the middle of a conversation, and, and, and not them but definitely with them. And even in partner meetings and stuff he would take a call and walk out of the room.

3927:35:18

MR. GRIFFIN: Sure. Sure. You had mentioned in your testimony that when you were asked by Ms. Seckinger about this Faris fee issue that really your concern was not that Alex was diverting fees, but he was trying to shelter fees for being disclosed in a civil case. Is that an accurate statement?

3937:35:45

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, let's make sure definitionally we're talking about the same thing. My concern was not that he was stealing, because I trusted him. I had no reason to believe that he was stealing. It was the latter, that what she conveyed to me was he was wanting to hide some fees or hide money somehow. I don't remember it being said that it was like I heard earlier, in Maggie's name. It was just that he was going to take the fees from Chris Wilson's account so there wouldn't be any record, is the way I understood it, in our trust account.

3947:36:22

MR. GRIFFIN: Right, and you said F no, we're not doing that.

3957:36:40

RONNIE CROSBY: Those were my words.

3967:36:48

MR. GRIFFIN: What was Alex's -- scratch that. After the murders of Maggie and Paul, did you -- the immediate aftermath going forward a few months, did Alex come to the office much?

3977:37:13

RONNIE CROSBY: It was sporadic, but, you know, I knew that he was having a lot of trouble sleeping. And, you know, he'd just lost his family and his father, and him and his father were very close. We were aware that -- or had an understanding that he was taking, like, medicine to try to help him sleep and maybe for anxiety, and just, you know, the normal things that you would expect there. So even when he came, I would walk in his office and he would be falling asleep in his chair. He would be sitting in there, you know, which was evident to me that he wasn't sleeping well. And so I know Ms. Seckinger mentioned pills earlier that he was taking. That's what we knew he was taking because he couldn't sleep at night. He would be up at all hours of the night.

3987:38:14

MR. GRIFFIN: And you noticed changes in his physical appearance, correct?

3997:38:16

RONNIE CROSBY: Yes, he was losing weight. I don't think he was eating very well by all reports.

4007:38:30

MR. GRIFFIN: And I guess -- let's sort of go back. The night of June 7th, the morning of June 8th, was -- I mean, what was his demeanor?

4017:38:44

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, his demeanor is that he was upset, I could tell that, and he, you know --

4027:38:54

MR. GRIFFIN: Did you see him cry?

4037:38:56

RONNIE CROSBY: Yeah, we cried together. I mean, he kept telling me, especially to me, he kept telling me how much Paul loved me, and, you know, every time he would say that we would -- it would be emotional. And he told me that several times over the next few days. It was just -- almost be how he would start a conversation with me when he would talk about Paul.

4047:39:30

MR. GRIFFIN: And then did he spend a lot of time with Buster down at Maggie's parents in Summerville? Do you know?

4057:39:41

RONNIE CROSBY: I knew -- can you give me the timeframe?

4067:39:45

MR. GRIFFIN: So, starting in June.

4077:39:47

RONNIE CROSBY: Okay. So, yeah, I know he and Maggie's parents had a good relationship. I recall because in some of this, I remember seeing some texts between he and I that he was down there. I don't remember -- well, they're dated. I'm sure you have them, and he told me he was down with Maggie's parents. It was one of the days in that time immediately following the murders.

4087:40:20

MR. GRIFFIN: Right, and then at one point in time around -- or if this is the 4th of July, did he come to your place by boat? Do you remember that? And --

4097:40:32

RONNIE CROSBY: I can't say that it was on the 4th of July, but I remember his brother Randy and his wife, I had invited them to my house, you know, for the 4th, you know, for spending -- and they had -- something that -- those of us in the law firm do a lot to spend time on the weekends together, and they were there, and I had asked Alex to come over, and he and Buster came by boat from Edisto.

4107:41:08

MR. GRIFFIN: And Alex was carrying a gun with him on the boat, was he not?

4117:41:18

RONNIE CROSBY: Yeah. Yes. He had a gun in a -- what I want to call a shopping bag, like a cloth type, you know, shopping bag, not one of those plastic ones.

4127:41:31

MR. GRIFFIN: Had you ever seen Alex carrying a gun around before for protection before the murders?

4137:41:40
4147:41:42

MR. GRIFFIN: At some point in time, Alex and Buster and the family put out a reward, did they not, for the capture of -- or tips for whoever would lead to the arrest of whoever killed Maggie and Paul. Do you remember that?

4157:42:07

RONNIE CROSBY: I do remember that, and who all was involved in the funding of it I don't know. But there was a reward, I believe, it was a -- I know a reward was put out.

4167:42:21

MR. GRIFFIN: And the firm agreed to administer it if there was -- anyone stepped forward.

4177:42:31
4187:42:34

MR. GRIFFIN: One second, Your Honor.

4197:42:38

(Break in proceedings.)

4207:42:41

MR. GRIFFIN: That's all I have, Your Honor.

4217:42:47

JUDGE NEWMAN: Redirect?

4227:42:49

REDIRECT EXAMINATION

4237:42:51

BY MR. WATERS:

4247:42:53

MR. WATERS: Did the firm ever have to pay anybody for that reward?

4257:43:03
4267:43:04

MR. WATERS: You were asked a lot of questions about your interactions and relationship with Alex Murdaugh. You've known Alex Murdaugh how long?

4277:43:15

RONNIE CROSBY: Well, I guess a total of twenty-five years or so.

4287:43:21

MR. WATERS: Did you really know Alex Murdaugh?

4297:43:24

MR. GRIFFIN: Objection, Your Honor. Character evidence.

4307:43:27

JUDGE NEWMAN: What is the question?

4317:43:30

MR. WATERS: Did he really know Alex Murdaugh.

4327:43:33

MR. GRIFFIN: Purely a character question.

4337:43:36

JUDGE NEWMAN: Did he know Alex Murdaugh. Did he really know Alex Murdaugh.

4347:43:42

MR. WATERS: Yes, sir.

4357:43:44

JUDGE NEWMAN: I sustain the objection.

4367:43:46

MR. WATERS: Thank you. Nothing further.

4377:43:49

JUDGE NEWMAN: Anything further?

4387:43:51

MR. GRIFFIN: No, Your Honor.

4397:43:53

JUDGE NEWMAN: You may step down.

4407:43:56

(The witness exited the stand.)

4417:43:58

JUDGE NEWMAN: If you'll go to the jury room for a break.

4427:44:19

(The jury left the courtroom.)

4437:44:31

JUDGE NEWMAN: All right. What's coming up next, Mr. Waters?

4447:44:43

MR. WATERS: Your Honor, we have the GSR expert and that's the next thing. You know, we can -- I think we can get that witness done before the end of the day.

4457:44:54

JUDGE NEWMAN: All right. We'll --

4467:44:56

MR. WATERS: Your Honor, I was just asking Mr. Griffin. He's the cross on this, and he's been talking nothing but GSR for two days. I'm worried about the timetable.

JUDGE NEWMAN: All right. Well, we'll take about 7 minutes.

(A break was taken.)

JUDGE NEWMAN: You may bring the jury.

(The jury returned to the courtroom.)

COURT BAILIFF: The jury is present, sir.

JUDGE NEWMAN: Thank you. Next witness.

MR. MEADORS: May it please the Court?

JUDGE NEWMAN: Yes, sir.