Skip to content
personpersonKenneth L. KinseyKenneth L. KinseyCrime-scene reconstruction expert retained by the State to analyze the shootings, physical evidence, and movement around the Moselle kennels.← All People
Expert witness

Kenneth L. Kinsey

Courtroom still of Kenneth L. Kinsey.

Crime-scene reconstruction expert retained by the State to analyze the shootings, physical evidence, and movement around the Moselle kennels.

899 lines·14 proceedings·6 mentions

About

Kenneth L. Kinsey testified for the State as a crime-scene reconstruction expert during both its initial case and its reply to defense experts. His qualification testimony covered about thirty years in law enforcement, twenty-two years focused on crime scenes and violent deaths, more than 800 death-scene investigations, forensic training, and prior expert work. He also identified fabric-impression analysis as an area of limited experience.

Kinsey described reviewing forensic reports, photographs, and measurements before inspecting the scene later in the investigation. He reconstructed Paul as sustaining a non-immediately-fatal shotgun wound inside the feed room, moving toward the doorway, and then receiving an immediately incapacitating wound near the doorway before falling outside. He also opined that another person placed Paul's phone on the back of his pants because Paul could not have retrieved it after the fatal wound and an ordinary fall would not usually have left it there.

Kinsey placed express limits on several conclusions. He gave little weight to the rifle-casing locations without the rifle and matching-ammunition testing, acknowledged that a similar tire could have made the impression associated with Maggie's calf, and did not assign a precise time or mechanism to that contact. Cross-examination emphasized his late involvement, objects that had been moved, a pressure-washed door, estimated measurements, and the limits of interpreting photographed footwear and tire impressions. He maintained that the blood trail and footwear evidence indicated movement toward the doorway while acknowledging the constraints created by the changed scene and unavailable weapons.

Defense counsel also challenged the orientation of an easel demonstration and questioned Kinsey about the shotgun barrel's position. After defense experts offered competing opinions involving an overhead contact shot, shooter height, and two shooters, Kinsey returned during the State's reply case to address those alternatives.

Trial Record (14)

20232023 Murder TrialJan 23, 2023 – Mar 3, 2023Called by prosecution

Kenneth L. Kinsey testified twice for the State as a crime-scene reconstruction expert, offering a qualified account of the shootings, movement at the feed room, physical impressions, and Paul's phone position. Cross-examination focused on the changed scene, unavailable weapons, measurement limits, and competing defense reconstructions.

Jury Selection Day 2

Day 19

Voir DireKenneth L. Kinsey - Voir DireKenneth L. KinseyCreighton Waters1highlight36lines spoken

Summary

Kenneth Kinsey described his crime-scene experience and forensic qualifications before the defense stipulated and the court declared him qualified as an expert.

Highlights (1)

Quoteβ€œI have boots on the ground processed north of 800 death scenes. Not all of those are homicides.”— Kenneth L. KinseyKinsey quantified his practical death-scene experience while expressly limiting the number that could be characterized as homicides.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
DirectKenneth L. Kinsey - DirectKenneth L. KinseyCreighton Waters3highlights188lines spoken

Summary

Kenneth Kinsey reconstructed the fatal shootings of Paul and Maggie Murdaugh and offered opinions about their positions, the shooters' locations, an ATV tire impression, and the placement of Paul's phone.

Highlights (3)

Quoteβ€œI was told to look at all of the evidence and determine what I may be helpful on, and to use my own judgment objectively, independently, and come up with my own conclusions.”— Kenneth L. KinseyKinsey described the scope of his engagement and characterized his reconstruction as an independent assessment.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
Quoteβ€œIt is most likely that tire. If it's not that tire, it's a similar tire with the same tread design.”— Kenneth L. KinseyKinsey stated his tire-impression conclusion while preserving the important limitation that he could not exclude a similar tire.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
Quoteβ€œIt's my opinion that his phone was placed there by someone else.”— Kenneth L. KinseyKinsey gave a direct opinion about the position of Paul's phone, a significant crime-scene interpretation.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
CrossKenneth L. Kinsey - CrossKenneth L. KinseyDick Harpootlian1highlight245lines spoken

Summary

Defense counsel used photographs, Kinsey's report, and physical demonstrations to test his shooting reconstruction, eliciting limitations about firing distance, exact shooter positions, and the tire-impression comparison.

Highlights (1)

Quoteβ€œI can't explain that, Mr. Harpootlian.”— Kenneth L. KinseyKinsey could not reconcile the demonstrated close firing position with the absence of stippling or powder burns.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
RecrossKenneth L. Kinsey - RecrossKenneth L. KinseyDick Harpootlian1highlight6lines spoken

Summary

Kenneth Kinsey confirmed the corrected orientation and shotgun position in a brief recross before the judge appointed Juror 826 as foreperson and emphasized the equal authority of all jurors.

Highlights (1)

Quoteβ€œIt was the opposite side of the door, yes, sir.”— Kenneth L. KinseyKinsey confirmed that the earlier easel demonstration had reversed the doorway orientation.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶

Day 21

Day 25

Day 26

ProceduralScope of Rebuttal TestimonyMentioned

Summary

The defense challenged the proposed breadth of the State's reply case, and the judge required rebuttal to be finely tailored while reserving individual rulings for specific objections.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

DirectKenneth L. Kinsey - DirectKenneth L. KinseyAlan Wilson1highlight179lines spoken

Summary

Kenneth Kinsey rebutted defense theories about shooter height, Paul's fatal wound, pellet trajectories, and two shooters while acknowledging that the number of shooters remained unresolved by his analysis.

Highlights (1)

Quoteβ€œI think his intentions are well, but I think his methods were flawed.”— Kenneth L. KinseyKinsey summarized his criticism of defense expert Michael Sutton's shooter-height analysis.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
CrossKenneth L. Kinsey - CrossKenneth L. KinseyJim Griffin1highlight204lines spoken

Summary

The defense tested Kinsey's trajectory reconstruction and its limits, while Kinsey maintained his account of Paul's fatal wound and acknowledged likely biological blowback on the shooter.

Highlights (1)

Quoteβ€œI don't share the same opinion as that doctor. But, yes, if he would be correct, that would make me incorrect.”— Kenneth L. KinseyKinsey expressly framed his reconstruction and Eisenstat's contact-wound opinion as conflicting conclusions.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶

Day 27

ClosingClosing Argument - Creighton WatersCreighton Waters1highlightMentioned

Summary

Waters tied the State's financial-motive theory to the kennel video, digital timeline, family firearms, forensic evidence, and Alex Murdaugh's changing accounts, then asked the jury to return guilty verdicts.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Highlights (1)

otherWaters compared the State and defense forensic reconstructions, relying on Ellen Riemer's and Kenneth Kinsey's testimony while disputing the defense theories concerning a contact wound, shooter height, and two shooters.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶