Skip to content
2023 Murder Trialtrial-daytrial-dayJohn B. ConradJohn MeadorsCreighton WatersPhillip D. BarberJim GriffinBritt DoveBrian VarnadoeRogan GibsonWill LovingdirectcrossredirectrecrossDay 6 - February 1, 2023Phone records and the kennel video placed Paul, Maggie, and a third voice at the kennels shortly before Paul's phone ceased showing active use. Rogan Gibson and Will Loving identified the third voice as Alex, while cross-examination emphasized limits in the movement, location, camera, gunshot-residue, and firearms evidence.
← Day 52023 Murder TrialDay 7 →

Day 6 - February 1, 2023

Phone Forensics, Kennel-Video Identifications, and Firearms Evidence

Judge Clifton B. Newman
13Proceedings
4Pages
4Witnesses
3,964Lines
Day 6 of 27
Appearing:

Phone records and the kennel video placed Paul, Maggie, and a third voice at the kennels shortly before Paul's phone ceased showing active use. Rogan Gibson and Will Loving identified the third voice as Alex, while cross-examination emphasized limits in the movement, location, camera, gunshot-residue, and firearms evidence.

Full day summary

SLED Lieutenant Britt Dove presented forensic records from Maggie, Alex, and Paul Murdaugh's phones. He testified that several June 7 calls appearing on Maggie's phone were absent from Alex's retained call log, indicating apparent removal, but he could not determine when or how they disappeared. Paul's records showed an answered FaceTime call ending around 8:44:45 p.m., messages marked read at 8:48:59 p.m., and no apparent active human use afterward. Dove authenticated the kennel video as recorded from 8:44:49 to 8:45:47 p.m. and said it contained three distinct voices he could not personally identify. Cross-examination focused on the limits of the device evidence. Dove said Maggie and Alex's phones appeared not to have been moved together by the same person because their recorded step periods did not overlap, but he repeatedly declined to equate Maggie's final orientation change with the moment her phone was discarded. He also acknowledged that delayed access to Maggie's locked phone could have allowed cached GPS data to be overwritten. Redirect and recross further established that step counts, distance estimates, orientation events, and a one-second camera-application entry could not establish precise movement or deliberate camera use. Investigator Brian Varnadoe described collecting gunshot-residue samples from Alex's hands at 11:15 p.m. He recorded no blood or debris and recalled the hands as clean, while explaining on cross-examination that he sampled only the hands, did not collect clothing or perform laboratory testing, and considered residue transfer from a gun possible. Rogan Gibson testified that Paul called him around 8:40 p.m. about Gibson's dog Cash, that he heard Maggie and a male voice he initially thought was Alex, and that later calls and messages to Paul went unanswered. After viewing the kennel video, Gibson identified the voices as Paul, Maggie, and Alex; that identification remained unchanged on cross-examination. The defense also elicited testimony about close family relationships, accessible firearms and outbuildings, spotty cellular coverage, and Alex's distraught demeanor after the killings. Will Loving described two family .300 Blackout rifles, including a tan rifle he helped sight in during spring 2021 and did not recall seeing afterward. He authenticated a Snapchat received from Paul's phone around 7:00 p.m. and, after the kennel video was played, identified the voices of Paul, Maggie, and Alex. Outside the jury's presence, the parties disputed whether defense questioning permitted evidence of alleged financial pressures. The court deferred an advance ruling, later stating that it would address the Rule 404(b) issue the next morning and expected the State to establish the relevant facts by clear and convincing evidence.

Video thumbnail9:49:21
Watch →

1. Britt Dove — Direct/Cross/Redirect/Recross

SLED Lieutenant Britt Dove continued presenting forensic records from the Murdaugh phones, authenticated Paul’s kennel video, and then faced cross, redirect, and recross examination about the timeline and limits of the device data.

Direct
Britt DoveJohn B. Conrad
1011 lines

Britt Dove detailed apparent missing calls and activity gaps on Alex Murdaugh's phone, traced Paul Murdaugh's final recorded phone use, and authenticated the kennel video's time and location metadata.

Cross
Britt DovePhillip D. Barber
599 lines

The defense used Britt Dove's phone records to argue that Alex and Maggie Murdaugh's phones were moving separately, while Dove resisted identifying an orientation change as proof the phone was thrown and acknowledged that cached GPS data may have been overwritten.

Redirect
Britt DoveJohn B. Conrad
174 lines

Britt Dove clarified the timing and limits of phone movement, message, and camera-application records, resisting conclusions about when Maggie's phone was thrown or deliberately used.

Recross
Britt DovePhillip D. Barber
28 lines

Britt Dove acknowledged that he had not reviewed SpringBoard metadata for Maggie Murdaugh's one-second camera event and declined to validate the defense's proposed explanation for it.

Highlights

Britt Dove - Directtestimony highlightAlex Murdaugh's phone and extraction reports were admitted. Dove testified that older calls remained while several June 7 calls reflected on Maggie's phone were absent from Alex's log, indicating apparent removal, although he could not determine when or how the calls disappeared.Britt Dove - Direct“Those calls were not on the phone anymore. How it happened, I don't know.”— Britt DoveDove expressly limited his conclusion, distinguishing the missing records from any determination of how they disappeared.Britt Dove - Directevidence eventDove authenticated the kennel video as recorded on Paul Murdaugh's phone from 8:44:49 to 8:45:47 p.m. near a red-roofed building on Moselle Road. He heard three distinct voices but could not identify them personally; the video was admitted over objection and played, with its audio not transcribed in the record.Britt Dove - Cross“I don't know that that's the time of the throw, the phone was thrown. I know that's the time the orientation change occurred. Now, that does not mean that the phone was thrown at that moment. It's hard for me to say.”— Britt DoveDove rejected the defense effort to equate the phone's final orientation change with the moment it was discarded.Britt Dove - CrossadmissionDove ultimately agreed that the two phones appeared not to have been moved together by the same person because their step records did not overlap, while continuing to limit his testimony to what the devices recorded.

2. Brian Varnadoe — Direct/Cross/Redirect

Colleton County investigator Brian Varnadoe described collecting gunshot-residue samples from Alex Murdaugh’s hands at Moselle, then addressed the collection’s limits and possible residue transfer on cross-examination.

Direct
Brian VarnadoeJohn Meadors
304 lines

Brian Varnadoe described collecting and documenting gunshot-residue samples from Alex Murdaugh, whom he found cooperative and apparently unimpaired, with clean hands and no visible blood or debris.

Cross
Brian VarnadoeJim Griffin
78 lines

Brian Varnadoe described Alex Murdaugh as cooperative, respectful, and shaken up, acknowledged limits on his GSR collection role and the possibility of transfer from a gun, and authenticated a sealed defense photograph of Paul Murdaugh.

Redirect
Brian VarnadoeJohn Meadors
12 lines

Brian Varnadoe clarified that he was not part of the actual investigation in a prior inmate-call case referenced during questioning.

Highlights

5. Will Loving — Direct/Cross/Redirect

The parties first argued over the admissibility of alleged financial-pressure evidence before Will Loving testified about Paul Murdaugh, the family’s firearms, June 7 Snapchat videos, and the voices in the kennel video. After cross-examination and redirect, the court deferred the Rule 404(b) issue until the next morning.

Procedural
Financial-Evidence Admissibility Argument

The parties disputed whether defense questioning opened the door to financial-motive evidence; the court allowed testimony to proceed and said it would rule on objections as they arose.

Direct
Will LovingCreighton Waters
338 lines

Will Loving described the Murdaugh family's .300 Blackout rifles, the spring 2021 sighting of a tan rifle at Moselle, his final communications with Paul, and his certain identification of Paul, Maggie, and Alex on the kennel video.

Cross
Will LovingJim Griffin
200 lines

Will Loving described Paul Murdaugh's casual firearm-storage practices, used an admitted receipt to refine the brown .300 Blackout timeline, and testified about close family relationships and Alex Murdaugh's grief after the killings.

Redirect
Will LovingCreighton Waters
91 lines

Will Loving authenticated a June 7 Snapchat video, limited his favorable view of Alex Murdaugh's family relationships to personal observation, and denied knowledge of Alex's financial affairs before the court announced a Rule 404(b) hearing.

Highlights

← Day 52023 Murder TrialDay 7 →