Skip to content
2023 Murder Trialtrial-daytrial-dayCreighton WatersJim GriffinAlex MurdaughcrossredirectrecrossDay 22 - February 24, 2023Waters challenged Murdaugh's kennel disclosure, timeline, financial pressure, and admitted lies. Murdaugh denied creating an alibi, defended his account on redirect and recross, and the court rejected a requested Doyle-based remedy.
← Day 212023 Murder TrialDay 23 →

Day 22 - February 24, 2023

Kennel Disclosure, Timeline Challenges, and the Doyle Ruling

Judge Clifton B. Newman
3Proceedings
1Pages
1Witnesses
2,289Lines
Day 22 of 27
Appearing:

Waters challenged Murdaugh's kennel disclosure, timeline, financial pressure, and admitted lies. Murdaugh denied creating an alibi, defended his account on redirect and recross, and the court rejected a requested Doyle-based remedy.

Full day summary

Creighton Waters completed his cross-examination of Alex Murdaugh by addressing his growing thefts and financial pressure, opioid use, changing account of June 7, and history of deception. Murdaugh acknowledged that law enforcement, his partners, and his friends first heard him admit his presence at the kennels during his trial testimony. Waters used phone, vehicle, GPS, and cell-tower records to challenge Murdaugh's account of leaving the kennels, returning to the house, traveling to Almeda, and calling 911. He alleged that Murdaugh made calls to create an alibi and later tried to influence Shelley Smith and Blanca Turrubiate-Simpson; Murdaugh denied those allegations and offered separate explanations for the conversations. Outside the jury's presence, the defense moved to strike questions about Murdaugh's earlier failure to disclose his kennel account and requested a curative instruction under Doyle v. Ohio. The court found no violation because Murdaugh had voluntarily spoken with investigators and acknowledged making false statements, and it denied both requests. On redirect, Murdaugh attributed repeated lies and concealed conduct to his opioid addiction, testified that more than $500,000 paid to Curtis Eddie Smith was for pills, and denied possessing Maggie's phone. He maintained that his phone, Maggie's phone, and his vehicle were never together, reaffirmed that the roadside shooting was intended to cause his own death, and denied hurting Maggie or Paul. On recross, Waters again challenged the addiction explanation and alleged alibi; Murdaugh acknowledged that some June 7 statements were wrong but denied manufacturing an alibi. The court then discussed tentative scheduling for the remaining witnesses, reply evidence, closing arguments, and jury charges.

Video thumbnail8:45:00
Watch →

1. Alex Murdaugh — Cross/Redirect/Recross

Alex Murdaugh completed his testimony after continued cross-examination about his finances, opioid use, changing kennel account, and the June 7 timeline, followed by redirect and recross. The court then addressed scheduling for the remaining evidence, closing arguments, and jury charges before the weekend adjournment.

Cross
Alex MurdaughCreighton Waters
2042 lines

Waters tested Alex Murdaugh's newly disclosed kennel account against digital data, prior interviews, financial deceptions, disputed conversations with Shelley Smith and Blanca Turrubiate-Simpson, and the timing of his 911 call. Murdaugh admitted extensive lying but denied influencing witnesses, manufacturing an alibi, or killing Maggie and Paul.

Redirect
Alex MurdaughJim Griffin
177 lines

Griffin sought to rehabilitate Alex Murdaugh through addiction, family-health, and device-timeline evidence. Murdaugh admitted repeated lies and the roadside fabrication, denied possessing Maggie's phone, distinguished mistaken times from deliberate deception, and again denied hurting Maggie or Paul.

Recross
Alex MurdaughCreighton Waters
42 lines

Waters pressed Alex Murdaugh about pills, an alleged manufactured alibi, inaccurate June 7 statements, and his delayed kennel disclosure. Murdaugh denied the central allegations and clarified the meaning of his statement about hurting loved ones.

Procedural
Closing-Argument and Jury-Charge Scheduling

The parties discussed completing testimony Monday and tentatively targeting Wednesday for arguments and jury charges. The court left under consideration—but viewed unfavorably—the defense request to split its closing argument.

Highlights

Alex Murdaugh - CrossadmissionWaters established Murdaugh's admissions that his thefts increased over time, that he stole about $3.7 million in 2019, that two substantial credit lines were nearly exhausted by June 2021, and that financial need was one reason he took the Faris fees. Murdaugh disputed that he had exhausted all readily accessible resources.Alex Murdaugh - CrossconfrontationWaters pressed Murdaugh on why his admitted presence at the kennels had not been disclosed earlier. Murdaugh acknowledged that law enforcement, partners, and friends first heard him state it during his trial testimony, while maintaining that he had sought meetings about his financial conduct.Alex Murdaugh - Cross“That law enforcement and my partners and my friends heard me say that for the first time, yes, I agree with that.”— Alex MurdaughMurdaugh acknowledged that his admitted kennel presence was first stated openly during his trial testimony.Alex Murdaugh - CrossimpeachmentUsing the condensed timeline, Waters challenged Murdaugh's account of leaving the kennels, returning to the house, recording movement beginning at 9:02, and making calls. Waters alleged that the calls manufactured an alibi; Murdaugh denied that allegation and said he was preparing to visit his mother.Alex Murdaugh - CrossimpeachmentWaters contrasted Murdaugh's earlier estimate of a 45-minute-to-one-hour Almeda visit with the vehicle timeline and Shelley Smith's testimony that he later asked her to say he stayed longer than 20 minutes. He then linked that challenge to Blanca Turrubiate-Simpson's account of a conversation about his June 7 clothing. Murdaugh denied trying to influence either woman and supplied separate explanations for both conversations.Alex Murdaugh - CrossconfrontationWaters used the approximately 20 seconds between the Suburban's recorded arrival at the kennels and the 911 call to challenge whether Murdaugh checked Maggie and Paul before calling. Murdaugh maintained that he called first and checked them while on the call, and he disputed that his prior interview said otherwise.Alex Murdaugh - CrossrulingOutside the jury's presence, the defense sought to strike questions about Murdaugh's failure to disclose the kennel account and requested a curative instruction under Doyle v. Ohio. The court found no Doyle violation because Murdaugh had voluntarily given statements and acknowledged misstatements, and denied the motions.Alex Murdaugh - Cross“I have lied well over a decade.”— Alex MurdaughThe concise admission crystallized Waters's extended credibility attack.Alex Murdaugh - Redirecttestimony highlightUsing the State's extended timeline, the defense elicited Murdaugh's denial that he ever possessed Maggie's phone that night and his assertion that his phone, her phone, and his vehicle were never together.Alex Murdaugh - Redirect“Because I knew that whoever had done this to them had Maggie's phone, and I knew that my phone and Maggie's phone and my car were never together at any point in time.”— Alex MurdaughThis states the defense's central redirect claim about the relationship between the phone and vehicle data.Alex Murdaugh - RecrossconfrontationAfter Waters repeated Murdaugh's statements that he had 'got out of there' and had hurt those he loved most, Murdaugh insisted on explaining that the latter statement referred to harm caused to his brother, partners, and clients—not to hurting Maggie and Paul.
← Day 212023 Murder TrialDay 23 →