Skip to content
2023 Murder Trialtrial-daytrial-dayDavid A. FernandezJohn MeadorsJim GriffinDick HarpootlianMike SuttonBuster Murdaughdirectcrossredirectvoir_direrecrossDay 19 - February 21, 2023Buster Murdaugh testified about family firearms, June 7 communications, and the aftermath of the killings. Engineering expert Mike Sutton presented trajectory and sound opinions, then acknowledged limits in his training, testing, and reconstruction assumptions.
← Day 182023 Murder TrialDay 20 →

Day 19 - February 21, 2023

Buster Murdaugh Testifies; Engineer Reconstructs Shots and Sound

Judge Clifton B. Newman
8Proceedings
2Pages
2Witnesses
3,233Lines
Day 19 of 27
Appearing:

Buster Murdaugh testified about family firearms, June 7 communications, and the aftermath of the killings. Engineering expert Mike Sutton presented trajectory and sound opinions, then acknowledged limits in his training, testing, and reconstruction assumptions.

Full day summary

Juror 441 reported feeling unwell and, with both sides' agreement, was replaced on the regular panel by randomly selected Juror 530. The court also advised Jim Griffin against posting or reposting trial-related material; Griffin agreed not to tweet or repost until the trial ended. Buster Murdaugh described the family's firearms and testified that guns were sometimes left in vehicles, on golf carts, or around Moselle. He characterized the family's June 7 calls as normal, recounted learning that Maggie and Paul had been shot, and described his father as crying and broken down afterward. On cross-examination, Buster said he had not known about his father's financial difficulties, described the boat-crash litigation as unsettling, and testified that he never again slept at Moselle. After being qualified as an engineering expert, Mike Sutton presented trajectory and acoustical reconstructions. He concluded that the measured .300 Blackout paths most likely reflected a short shooter or an unusually low firing posture and opined that it was very unlikely Alex Murdaugh fired the quail-pen shot. Sutton also testified that a person inside the quiet main house who was not listening for gunfire would not hear the tested rifle shots, while agreeing that someone at the kennels would hear the gunfire. On cross-examination, Sutton acknowledged that he lacked formal firearms, pathology, gunshot-wound, and shooting-reconstruction training or certification. He also acknowledged limitations involving an unlabeled vehicle-speed graph, representative ammunition and testing conditions, the untested feed-room pellet, and trajectory calculations that did not account for possible impacts or deflection through bodies, wood, or other objects. He maintained his principal opinions but clarified that the trajectory lines fixed the weapon's path, not the shooter's identity, and that people of different sizes could place a weapon on those lines by assuming different postures.

Video thumbnail9:21:30
Watch →

2. Buster Murdaugh — Direct/Cross/Redirect

Juror 530 joined the regular panel before Buster Murdaugh testified about family life at Moselle, June 7 communications and events, and the family's circumstances before and after the killings. Cross-examination addressed Moselle and Almeda, boat-crash litigation, Alex Murdaugh's clothing and finances, and Paul's use of Buster's identification.

Procedural
Juror Replacement and Courtroom Publicity

The court replaced absent Juror 441 with randomly selected Juror 530 without objection, discussed the defense's projected timetable, and cautioned Jim Griffin against trial-related posting after his repost of a Washington Post article.

Direct
Buster MurdaughJim Griffin
978 lines

Buster Murdaugh described family life, firearms, June 7 communications, and the aftermath of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh's deaths, while the defense addressed Almeda access, clothing, a reward notice, and a disputed recorded phrase.

Cross
Buster MurdaughJohn Meadors
178 lines

Buster Murdaugh was questioned about Moselle and Almeda access, the recent disclosure of a parking detail, his ignorance of his father's finances, boat-case stress, Alex's clothing, and his refusal to sleep at Moselle again.

Redirect
Buster MurdaughJim Griffin
17 lines

Buster Murdaugh clarified that his mother usually took dogs to Edisto and that he understood Bubba and Grady were at Moselle on June 7.

Highlights

3. Mike Sutton — Direct/Cross/Redirect/Recross/Voir Dire

Defense engineering expert Mike Sutton presented trajectory, acoustics, and vehicle-motion analyses, then faced challenges to his qualifications, assumptions, and methods. He maintained his principal conclusions before being excused, and the court recessed for the day.

Voir Dire
Mike SuttonDick Harpootlian
75 lines

Mike Sutton reviewed his engineering credentials and reconstruction experience before the court, without State objection, admitted him as an expert in shooting-incident reconstruction, acoustical engineering, and motor-vehicle reconstruction.

Direct
Mike SuttonDick Harpootlian
948 lines

Mike Sutton presented defense reconstructions of the shooting trajectories, gunshot audibility, and vehicle evidence, opining that the quail-pen shot most likely came from a short, low-positioned shooter and was very unlikely to have been fired by Alex Murdaugh.

Cross
Mike SuttonDavid A. Fernandez
759 lines

The prosecution challenged Mike Sutton's qualifications, unlabeled graphs, acoustic-test inputs, projectile assumptions, and short-shooter renderings; Sutton acknowledged several limits but maintained that his engineering analysis supported low firing positions and faint gunshot audibility inside Moselle.

Redirect
Mike SuttonDick Harpootlian
193 lines

Mike Sutton defended his trajectory and acoustic analyses, used newly admitted SLED crime-scene notes to explain projectile paths, acknowledged limits in his perspective and source data, and reaffirmed his opinion that Alex Murdaugh could not have fired the quail-pen shot under the stated firing-position assumptions.

Recross
Mike SuttonDavid A. Fernandez
19 lines

Mike Sutton agreed that his trajectory lines fixed the weapon's path rather than a particular shooter and that a person at the kennels would have heard the gunfire.

Highlights

Mike Sutton - Directtestimony highlightUsing the trajectories, cartridge-case locations, scanned figures, and a rifle demonstration, Sutton testified that a 5-foot-2 to 5-foot-4 shooter firing low was the most likely explanation; he acknowledged that a taller person could fire from an awkward or altered posture but opined that it was very unlikely Alex Murdaugh fired the quail-pen shot.Mike Sutton - Direct“In my opinion, it's very unlikely that he fired that shot.”— Mike SuttonSutton directly applied his quail-pen trajectory and height analysis to Alex Murdaugh.Mike Sutton - Directtestimony highlightSutton described controlled acoustical testing between the kennels and main house, an audio sample was played, and he concluded that a person inside the quiet house who was not listening for shots would not hear the .300 Blackout fire; he said some shotgun tests were inaudible even in a quiet house.Mike Sutton - Direct“So, you could barely hear it, and we were all listening for it. So, if you were in the house, even if you were walking around, you wouldn't hear that. I could barely hear it and I was listening for it. So, what that tells you is that the sound inside the house is right at -- right at that background level, it's kind of sitting right in your background at the quiet house. And so if you were doing any kind of activities inside the house, you wouldn't hear it. And certainly if you had the TV on -- which will be, remember 10 DB is twice as loud, so it's 35 if you've got the TV on -- there's no way you could hear that shot.”— Mike SuttonSutton summarized the defense acoustical theory after the test recording was played.Mike Sutton - CrossimpeachmentSutton acknowledged having no formal pathology, firearms, gunshot-wound, or shooting-incident-reconstruction training or certification, while maintaining that his exterior- and terminal-ballistics opinions remained within his engineering expertise.Mike Sutton - Cross“No. I'm not a firearms expert or a pathologist or a wound expert. That's not my area of physics; it's not my area of expertise.”— Mike SuttonSutton expressly defined the limits of his formal subject-matter expertise during the prosecution's foundational challenge.Mike Sutton - CrossadmissionSutton admitted that his trajectory calculations did not account for possible interaction or deflection through a body, wood, or other objects, and clarified that movement and victim orientation were outside the analysis he performed.Mike Sutton - RecrossadmissionSutton agreed that the green lines fixed the weapon's path rather than a particular shooter's identity, and that people of different sizes could position themselves to fire while the weapon remained on the line.
← Day 182023 Murder TrialDay 20 →