Day 17 - February 16, 2023
The court reaffirmed its ruling allowing inquiry into Alex Murdaugh's relationship with Curtis Edward Smith. Kenneth Kinsey presented and defended his crime-scene reconstruction, and Ryan Kelly detailed inconsistencies and evidence from the later roadside-shooting investigation.
Full day summary
8:40:302. Kenneth L. Kinsey — Direct/Cross/Redirect/Recross/Voir Dire
The court revisited the scope of roadside-shooting evidence before Kenneth Kinsey presented and defended his forensic reconstruction of Paul and Maggie Murdaugh’s shootings; Juror 826 was then appointed foreperson.
Highlights
Roadside-Shooting Evidence ArgumentrulingThe defense placed its objection to the prior redirect ruling on the record, arguing that its cross-examination had not opened the door to the roadside shooting and that any responsive evidence had to remain proportional. The court reaffirmed its ruling that the defense had introduced the relationship between Alex Murdaugh and Eddie Smith and that the State could explore it, while reserving discussion about the permissible extent of that evidence.Roadside-Shooting Evidence Argument“I find that what this Court allowed on yesterday was proportional because it was in relation to evidence elicited not by the State but by the defendant, and the State is entitled to explore this relationship with or between the defendant and Eddie Smith.”— Clifton NewmanThe court explained why it was standing by its opening-the-door ruling and permitting the State to explore the Murdaugh-Smith relationship.Kenneth L. Kinsey - Directtestimony highlightKinsey testified that Paul's fatal second shot occurred near the doorway, placed the shooter outside and to the right of it, and rejected a top-down contact or self-inflicted explanation.Kenneth L. Kinsey - Cross“I don't know where they wanted the end of that barrel placed, Mr. Harpootlian. I can't tell you that part. With my science I can't -- all I can look at is the angle.”— Kenneth L. KinseyKinsey expressly limited his opinion to the physical angle rather than the shooter's precise mechanics or intent.Kenneth L. Kinsey - Crosstestimony highlightKinsey qualified the tire-impression comparison: without properly scaled photographs or the actual tire, he could identify a class association but not exclude all other similar tires.
3. Ryan Kelly — Direct (Recall)
SLED agent Ryan Kelly testified about the roadside-shooting investigation, evidence connecting Alex Murdaugh and Curtis Edward Smith to the scene, and the absence of evidence linking Smith to the Moselle killings.
Highlights
Ryan Kelly - Direct“We searched the area extensively, and we never were able to locate the significant piece of debris that Mr. Murdaugh described as causing his tire to go flat.”— Ryan KellyKelly identified a physical inconsistency between the roadside account and the investigation of the scene.Ryan Kelly - Directtestimony highlightKelly testified that financial records recovered from Smith's residence led investigators to checks written by Murdaugh. The court then admitted and played the September 13 interview, after which Kelly said earlier accounts had not identified Smith and that investigators had no evidence connecting Smith to the Moselle killings.