Skip to content
personpersonRachel NguyenRachel NguyenSLED forensic-serology expert who screened firearm, vehicle, clothing, ammunition, and raincoat evidence.← All People
Expert witness

Rachel Nguyen

Courtroom still of Rachel Nguyen.

SLED forensic-serology expert who screened firearm, vehicle, clothing, ammunition, and raincoat evidence.

164 lines·4 proceedings·1 mention

About

Rachel Nguyen testified as a SLED forensic-serology expert. She described her scientific education, laboratory training, competency testing, and responsibilities for screening and preparing evidence.

On direct examination, Nguyen explained her processing of ammunition, firearms, vehicles, clothing, fingernail clippings, a storage-room doorknob, and a blue raincoat. She reported mixed findings, including presumptive indications on some samples and a positive Hematrace result from a Chevy Suburban steering-wheel swab. Other identified vehicle swabs were negative for identified human blood, and all 71 tested stains on the raincoat were negative for the possible presence of blood.

Nguyen distinguished serological screening and sample preparation from DNA-profile analysis. She collected touch-DNA material and forwarded prepared samples to the DNA section, but she did not perform profile comparisons or offer conclusions identifying the source of DNA.

Cross-examination focused on the limits of her findings. Nguyen corrected the number of combined .300 Blackout cartridges from seven to six and agreed that the combined result could not be assigned to a particular cartridge. She also explained that presumptive tests neither confirmed blood nor established that a result was human, and that limited firearm-swab material was preserved for DNA analysis rather than used for Hematrace testing.

Trial Record (4)

20232023 Murder TrialJan 23, 2023 – Mar 3, 2023Called by prosecution

Rachel Nguyen testified as a forensic-serology expert about SLED's screening and preparation of firearm, vehicle, clothing, ammunition, and raincoat evidence. Her testimony identified mixed positive and negative findings while distinguishing presumptive screening from confirmatory testing and downstream DNA analysis.

Day 16

DirectRachel Nguyen - DirectRachel NguyenSavannah M. Goude2highlights84lines spoken

Summary

Rachel Nguyen explained blood screening and DNA-sample preparation for firearm, storage-room-door, vehicle, fingernail, clothing, shoe, and raincoat evidence, reporting qualified positive and negative results but no DNA-profile comparisons.

Highlights (2)

Quoteβ€œItem 56, which was swabs collected from steering wheel, had a positive result, which means blood was identified on this item.”— Rachel NguyenNguyen distinguished the steering-wheel swab from the other listed Suburban swabs by reporting a positive confirmatory result identifying blood.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
Quoteβ€œI tested 71 stains. All 71 stains were negative for the possible presence of blood.”— Rachel NguyenThe negative result sharply limits what the blood screening established about the raincoat.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
CrossRachel Nguyen - CrossRachel NguyenPhillip D. Barber3highlights65lines spoken

Summary

Rachel Nguyen explained that firearm-swab results were only presumptive, not human-specific or confirmatory, and clarified her limited role in preparing samples for later DNA analysis.

Highlights (3)

Quoteβ€œSo, a presumptive test is indicating the possible presence of a body fluid, in this case blood. It's not confirming the presence. It's just an indication so that we can further test that stain.”— Rachel NguyenClearly states the limited meaning of the positive presumptive blood findings explored on cross-examination.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
Quoteβ€œIt is not specifically human blood. It can be human blood or animal blood.”— Rachel NguyenEstablishes that the presumptive test could not identify the detected material specifically as human blood.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶
Quoteβ€œThat's correct. I am just preparing the samples for further analysis.”— Rachel NguyenDefines Nguyen's role and separates her sample preparation from the subsequent DNA analysis and reporting.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶