Jan Malinowski testified about Palmetto State Bank's lending relationship with Alex Murdaugh, including substantial debt, an overdraft covered through advances made before supporting paperwork, and disputed collateral. Cross-examination emphasized Murdaugh's favorable customer history and continued access to credit, while redirect addressed circumstances Malinowski said would have ended further lending.
Jan Malinowski

Palmetto State Bank executive familiar with Alex Murdaugh's loans, overdrafts, collateral, and access to credit.
About
Jan Malinowski, president and CEO of Palmetto State Bank, testified about the bank's lending relationship with Alex Murdaugh. Using board materials, account statements, loan records, wire documents, and collateral records, he described Murdaugh's debts, advances from the bank, and proposed security for those obligations.
Malinowski said an August 2021 relationship review placed Murdaugh's direct and indirect principal obligations at about $4.2 million. He described a $350,000 wire to Wilson Law Group and a later $400,000 bank-funded deposit that covered an overdraft of roughly $347,785. He testified that the advances preceded supporting loan paperwork and that, based on the bank's sequential loan numbering, a note dated July 15 was generated after the August inquiry.
His testimony also addressed the proposed collateral and the stated purpose of the borrowing. Malinowski said the contemplated Edisto mortgage was not placed, Green Swamp stock was already cross-collateralized, and the records did not show the questioned funds being used for the described Edisto remodeling. He also explained that sales of certain properties required satisfying amounts owed to the bank.
On cross-examination, Malinowski acknowledged that several referenced accounts had positive balances on June 7, that Murdaugh had received favorable treatment as a bank customer, and that he knew of no denied credit request before September 2021. He qualified matters beyond his knowledge, could not determine the secured portion of the debt without supporting documents, and did not confirm the defense's suggested cumulative-interest figure. On redirect, he said disclosure of the alleged theft, diversion of fees, employment loss, or disbarment would have ended continued lending; on recross, he confirmed that the bank's mortgages remained in place.
Trial Record (9)
No proceedings match this filter.